Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.5.20, 6.4.0
-
None
Description
The galeramon documentation for the priority parameters mentions that nodes with a non-negative priority value are never selected as the Master node of the cluster.
The code appears to be wrong and instead of ignoring servers with priority=0, it ends up ignoring the node priority if all other nodes are gone. The reason why it ends up accepting them is because the default value of priority is 0.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
MXS-4662 Galeramon use_priority example is incorrect
- Closed