Uploaded image for project: 'MariaDB Server'
  1. MariaDB Server
  2. MDEV-507

deb/rpm packages for galera builds

Details

    Description

      something needs to be done with DEB and RPM package names - not the file names (which is fixed already), but subpackage names. The reason is that packages should be distinguished from regular/vanilla MariaDB.

      also obsoletes/conflicts should ensure these packages cannot be installed together with regular mariadb packages

      we'll put galera packages in our apt/yum repositories, so that the package manager will be able to satisfy dependencies automatically (MDEV-527)

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is blocked by

          Task - A task that needs to be done. MDEV-527 add galera packages to our repositories

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed

          Task - A task that needs to be done. MDEV-528 configure rpm install VMs to use our yum repositories

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed

          Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            wlad Vladislav Vaintroub added a comment -

            From IRC
            <elenst> wlad: but if we rename the packages, won't they lose the ability to replace the "normal" MariaDB packages?
            <wlad> elenst, I frankly do not know what is intended
            <wlad> should they be able to replace vanilla mariadb or not.. this is perhaps also to think about
            <wlad> actually such questions should be though about every time a new product is released
            <wlad> this time we did not do that

            wlad Vladislav Vaintroub added a comment - From IRC <elenst> wlad: but if we rename the packages, won't they lose the ability to replace the "normal" MariaDB packages? <wlad> elenst, I frankly do not know what is intended <wlad> should they be able to replace vanilla mariadb or not.. this is perhaps also to think about <wlad> actually such questions should be though about every time a new product is released <wlad> this time we did not do that
            serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment -

            mariadb-galera rpms are now tested in buildbot. but only on centos6-amd64 the test succeeds.

            serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment - mariadb-galera rpms are now tested in buildbot. but only on centos6-amd64 the test succeeds.
            ratzpo Rasmus Johansson (Inactive) added a comment -

            This is the fixing debian packaging for Galera task

            ratzpo Rasmus Johansson (Inactive) added a comment - This is the fixing debian packaging for Galera task
            michee.lengronne Michée Lengronne added a comment -

            I have a simple question: When can we expect a .db release for MariaDB Galera in the repositories ?

            michee.lengronne Michée Lengronne added a comment - I have a simple question: When can we expect a .db release for MariaDB Galera in the repositories ?
            holyfoot Alexey Botchkov added a comment -

            Proposed patch. Part I
            http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003872.html

            holyfoot Alexey Botchkov added a comment - Proposed patch. Part I http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003872.html
            holyfoot Alexey Botchkov added a comment -

            Part II
            http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003873.html

            holyfoot Alexey Botchkov added a comment - Part II http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003873.html
            holyfoot Alexey Botchkov added a comment -

            Two more patches:
            http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003906.html
            http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003907.html

            holyfoot Alexey Botchkov added a comment - Two more patches: http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003906.html http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2012-November/003907.html
            serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment -

            Looks almost ok. Just one comment:
            I've run 'make install' and found seven new files. I mean, 5.5-galera tree installs seven extra files, as compared to the vanilla mariadb. You need to add these files to the package, to ensure they're installed in .deb too. They are:

            ./README-wsrep
            ./bin/wsrep_sst_common
            ./bin/wsrep_sst_mysqldump
            ./bin/wsrep_sst_rsync
            ./bin/wsrep_sst_xtrabackup
            ./support-files/wsrep.cnf
            ./support-files/wsrep_notify

            serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment - Looks almost ok. Just one comment: I've run 'make install' and found seven new files. I mean, 5.5-galera tree installs seven extra files, as compared to the vanilla mariadb. You need to add these files to the package, to ensure they're installed in .deb too. They are: ./README-wsrep ./bin/wsrep_sst_common ./bin/wsrep_sst_mysqldump ./bin/wsrep_sst_rsync ./bin/wsrep_sst_xtrabackup ./support-files/wsrep.cnf ./support-files/wsrep_notify

            People

              holyfoot Alexey Botchkov
              wlad Vladislav Vaintroub
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              13 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Git Integration

                  Error rendering 'com.xiplink.jira.git.jira_git_plugin:git-issue-webpanel'. Please contact your Jira administrators.