Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
10.5.27, 10.4(EOL), 10.5
-
None
Description
Splitted from MDEV-28804.
Run the following test with --innodb_buffer_pool_size=5m, in a build of CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo and WITH_DBUG_TRACE:BOOL=OFF.
10.5 a7ee3bc58bc23ad7ac5ced54dc745d0e65bee524 |
--source include/have_innodb.inc
|
CREATE TABLE t1 (d DOUBLE) engine=innodb; |
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (0x0061),(0x0041),(0x00E0),(0x00C0),(0x1EA3),(0x1EA2),(0x00E3),(0x00C3),(0x00E1),(0x00C1),(0x1EA1),(0x1EA0); |
INSERT INTO t1 SELECT t1.* FROM t1,t1 t2,t1 t3,t1 t4,t1 t5,t1 t6; |
 |
drop table t1; |
It either hangs or results in 1206: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size.
See marko's comment for some initial analysis and hint:
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-28804?focusedCommentId=278885&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-278885
Attachments
Issue Links
- is blocked by
-
MDEV-28804 Increased lock objects in 10.6+ leading to significant slowdown when using a limited InnoDB buffer pool, including in release builds
- Stalled
- relates to
-
MDEV-28803 ERROR 1206 (HY000): The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
- Confirmed
-
MDEV-28805 SET GLOBAL innodb_buffer_pool_size=12*1024*1024 has different outcomes depending on version
- Closed