Uploaded image for project: 'MariaDB Server'
  1. MariaDB Server
  2. MDEV-28558

The MTR based test innodb_defrag_concurrent is not repeatable.

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • 10.6.8, 10.8.3
    • 11.1.0
    • Tests
    • None

    Description

      Logging: ./mtr  --mem --repeat=2 innodb_defrag_concurrent
      ..
      =================================================
       
      TEST                                      RESULT   TIME (ms) or COMMENT
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      worker[1] Using MTR_BUILD_THREAD 300, with reserved ports 16000..16019
      innodb.innodb_defrag_concurrent 'innodb' [ pass ]  29589
      innodb.innodb_defrag_concurrent 'innodb' [ 2 fail ]
              Test ended at 2022-05-13 12:39:55
       
      CURRENT_TEST: innodb.innodb_defrag_concurrent
      --- /Server_bin/10.8_asan/mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_defrag_concurrent.result     2022-03-01 17:39:21.000000000 +0100
      +++ /Server_bin/10.8_asan/mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_defrag_concurrent.reject     2022-05-13 12:39:54.905656077 +0200
      @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
       15800
       select count(stat_value) > 0 from mysql.innodb_index_stats where table_name like '%t1%' and  stat_name  in ('n_pages_freed');
       count(stat_value) > 0
      -0
      +1
       select count(stat_value) > 0 from mysql.innodb_index_stats where table_name like '%t1%' and  stat_name  in ('n_page_split');
       count(stat_value) > 0
       1
       
      mysqltest: Result content mismatch
       
      The reason for that is the following:
      The creation of the table t1 leads to records like
      select database_name, table_name, index_name, stat_name, stat_value, sample_size
      from mysql.innodb_index_stats where table_name like '%t1%' and  stat_name  in ('n_page_split');
      database_name	table_name	index_name	stat_name	stat_value	sample_size	
      test	t1	PRIMARY	n_page_split	#	NULL	
      test	t1	second	n_page_split	#	NULL
      After some OPTIMIZE t1 we get some additional record
      test	t1	FTS_DOC_ID_INDEX	n_page_split  #	NULL
       
      And these records do not disappear if the table t1 gets dropped.
      IMHO this is rather harmless as long as parts of the server
      - do not use these values at all
      or
      - are aware that whatever statistics which is older than the create
        data of a table mentioned is no more valid.
       
      The repetition of innodb_defrag_concurrent meets at its begin this
      historic data of the previous execution and fails with result set difference.
      
      

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              mleich Matthias Leich
              mleich Matthias Leich
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Git Integration

                  Error rendering 'com.xiplink.jira.git.jira_git_plugin:git-issue-webpanel'. Please contact your Jira administrators.