Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Critical
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
1.1.4
-
None
-
Docker image python:3.10
Host machine: Ubuntu 22.04.1
-
3.10.6
Description
The fix for CONPY-118 only moved the memory leak instead of fixing it. If you take the exact same repro script from that bug and change the line cursor.execute('SELECT NOW()') to cursor.execute('SELECT ? AS c', (counter,)) the memory leak is still present.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
CONPY-118 Memory leak
- Closed