Uploaded image for project: 'MariaDB MaxScale'
  1. MariaDB MaxScale
  2. MXS-381

support for transparent proxy

Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 2.2.0
    • mariadbbackend
    • None
    • 2017-32

    Description

      Hi,

      is it possible to implement "transparent-proxy" feature in maxscale ?

      https://www.percona.com/doc/percona-xtradb-cluster/5.5/howtos/haproxy.html

      It means basically, at new connection to backend from maxscale:
      Sending to the db backend the originating IP via a protocol, so that the original IP can be displayed in show processlist, and used in authentification definition.

      Currently, only percona server supports this feature.

      Thanks !
      Joffrey

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is duplicated by

          Task - A task that needs to be done. MDEV-11159 Server Proxy Protocol Support

          • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Closed
          relates to

          New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. MXS-2499 MaxScale still authenticates clients locally when proxy_protocol=on

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed

          Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            jpalmer Jeff Palmer added a comment -

            I too would like to see the proxy protocol available for maxscale. It's a bit of a pain to manage 2 user accounts/ACL's for every connection to maxscale. having the proxy protocol would effectively cut the our ACL's in half.

            jpalmer Jeff Palmer added a comment - I too would like to see the proxy protocol available for maxscale. It's a bit of a pain to manage 2 user accounts/ACL's for every connection to maxscale. having the proxy protocol would effectively cut the our ACL's in half.
            esa.korhonen Esa Korhonen added a comment -

            Not really practical with current server implementations. Revisit this issue if/when more servers support this.

            esa.korhonen Esa Korhonen added a comment - Not really practical with current server implementations. Revisit this issue if/when more servers support this.

            People

              esa.korhonen Esa Korhonen
              joffrey Joffrey MICHAIE (Inactive)
              Votes:
              3 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Git Integration

                  Error rendering 'com.xiplink.jira.git.jira_git_plugin:git-issue-webpanel'. Please contact your Jira administrators.