Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
10.3.2
-
Ubuntu 16.0.2
Description
I want to confirm if this is the expected behaviour on tmpfs/ramdisk filesystem
While benchmarking sysbench oltp_update_index lua for a 150 sec run I see drop in tps consistently after 80 sec . This is happening both in intel x86 as well as ARM platform but hurting ARM a little more as good as 10%,
Setup : In memory filesystem( datadir is kept in tmpfs filesystem) and bufferpool is 50gb, innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit =0,and logfile size is 2 gb ,bufferpool instance is 30
Test : 20 tables with 100000 records in each table. Run for 64 threads with sysbench oltp_update_index.lua (update tests)
Time : 150 sec
Few observation :
1) I don’t see the issue in pure I/O operations ie The bufferpool size is kept default and datadir is in ssd’s instead of tmpfs.
2) The tps as expected is heavily dropped in pure I/O so the issues seems to have masked.
3) Flushing seems to be slow when we do in memory test and not able to cope up with read speed in tmpfs.
4) In pure I/O read/write test I see innodb_flush_sync =0 is not recommended as the TPS is almost 40% compared to async operations.
017-11-24 9:40:34 76 [Note] Detected table cache mutex contention at instance 1: 20% waits. Additional table cache instance activated. Number of instances after activation: 2.
[ 10s ] thds: 64 tps: 138157.88 qps: 138157.88 (r/w/o: 0.00/138157.88/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.14 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 20s ] thds: 64 tps: 164025.68 qps: 164025.68 (r/w/o: 0.00/164025.68/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.94 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 30s ] thds: 64 tps: 164611.23 qps: 164611.23 (r/w/o: 0.00/164611.23/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.94 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 40s ] thds: 64 tps: 164317.42 qps: 164317.42 (r/w/o: 0.00/164317.42/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.94 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 50s ] thds: 64 tps: 164128.75 qps: 164128.85 (r/w/o: 0.00/164128.85/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.94 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 60s ] thds: 64 tps: 164028.19 qps: 164028.19 (r/w/o: 0.00/164028.19/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.94 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 70s ] thds: 64 tps: 148203.75 qps: 148203.65 (r/w/o: 0.00/148203.65/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.23 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 80s ] thds: 64 tps: 113156.11 qps: 113156.11 (r/w/o: 0.00/113156.11/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.58 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 90s ] thds: 64 tps: 118685.99 qps: 118685.99 (r/w/o: 0.00/118685.99/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.52 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 100s ] thds: 64 tps: 118142.32 qps: 118142.32 (r/w/o: 0.00/118142.32/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.55 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 110s ] thds: 64 tps: 122747.22 qps: 122747.22 (r/w/o: 0.00/122747.22/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.50 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 120s ] thds: 64 tps: 112475.31 qps: 112475.31 (r/w/o: 0.00/112475.31/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.58 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 130s ] thds: 64 tps: 112336.17 qps: 112336.17 (r/w/o: 0.00/112336.17/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.58 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 140s ] thds: 64 tps: 121541.22 qps: 121541.22 (r/w/o: 0.00/121541.22/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.50 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 150s ] thds: 64 tps: 116951.59 qps: 116951.59 (r/w/o: 0.00/116951.59/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.55 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
I modified the cnf files to use the below two parameter
innodb_flush_sync=0
innodb_io_capacity =8000
[ 10s ] thds: 64 tps: 139392.95 qps: 139392.95 (r/w/o: 0.00/139392.95/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.08 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 20s ] thds: 64 tps: 163050.96 qps: 163050.96 (r/w/o: 0.00/163050.96/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.90 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 30s ] thds: 64 tps: 162052.53 qps: 162052.53 (r/w/o: 0.00/162052.53/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.90 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 40s ] thds: 64 tps: 162532.91 qps: 162532.91 (r/w/o: 0.00/162532.91/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.92 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 50s ] thds: 64 tps: 163324.90 qps: 163324.90 (r/w/o: 0.00/163324.90/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.90 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 60s ] thds: 64 tps: 164528.45 qps: 164528.65 (r/w/o: 0.00/164528.65/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.89 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 70s ] thds: 64 tps: 164178.11 qps: 164177.91 (r/w/o: 0.00/164177.91/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.89 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 80s ] thds: 64 tps: 162853.44 qps: 162853.44 (r/w/o: 0.00/162853.44/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.90 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 90s ] thds: 64 tps: 163859.76 qps: 163859.76 (r/w/o: 0.00/163859.76/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.89 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 100s ] thds: 64 tps: 163382.50 qps: 163382.50 (r/w/o: 0.00/163382.50/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.89 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 110s ] thds: 64 tps: 164321.72 qps: 164321.82 (r/w/o: 0.00/164321.82/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.87 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 120s ] thds: 64 tps: 163324.30 qps: 163324.20 (r/w/o: 0.00/163324.20/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.90 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 130s ] thds: 64 tps: 164130.22 qps: 164130.22 (r/w/o: 0.00/164130.22/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.89 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 140s ] thds: 64 tps: 163013.68 qps: 163013.68 (r/w/o: 0.00/163013.68/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 0.90 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
[ 150s ] thds: 64 tps: 155699.33 qps: 155699.33 (r/w/o: 0.00/155699.33/0.00) lat (ms,95%): 1.08 err/s: 0.00 reconn/s: 0.00
Attachments
Issue Links
- blocks
-
MDEV-14442 Optimization for ARM64 platform.
- Open