Uploaded image for project: 'MariaDB Server'
  1. MariaDB Server
  2. MDEV-11212

Clean-up MariaDB atomic operations

Details

    • Task
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 10.3.0
    • OTHER
    • None
    • 10.2.4-4

    Attachments

      Issue Links

        relates to

        Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. MDEV-8403 Build on AIX: my_atomic.h", line 121.2: 1506-205 (S) #error atomic ops for this platform are not implemented

        • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
        • Closed

        Activity

          Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment -

          serg, please review top 6 patches at bb-10.2-mdev11212

          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment - serg , please review top 6 patches at bb-10.2-mdev11212
          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment -

          Build failed on kvm-bintar-centos5-x86 (~10 years old gcc-4.1.2), but succeeded on kvm-bintar-centos5-amd64. I can guess the problem is that x86 version didn't support atomic operations on a 64bit target.

          CentOS 5 EOL is Mar 31, 2017. Do we need to care about it?

          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment - Build failed on kvm-bintar-centos5-x86 (~10 years old gcc-4.1.2), but succeeded on kvm-bintar-centos5-amd64. I can guess the problem is that x86 version didn't support atomic operations on a 64bit target. CentOS 5 EOL is Mar 31, 2017. Do we need to care about it?
          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment -

          7 patches

          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment - 7 patches
          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment -

          8 patches

          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment - 8 patches
          serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment -

          I'd think we need to care about CentOS 5 until it's EOLed.
          And then (or may be sooner) we'll need to find another bintar builder, perhaps.
          Then we won't care about gcc 4.1.2

          serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment - I'd think we need to care about CentOS 5 until it's EOLed. And then (or may be sooner) we'll need to find another bintar builder, perhaps. Then we won't care about gcc 4.1.2
          serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment -

          ok to push into 10.3 tree

          serg Sergei Golubchik added a comment - ok to push into 10.3 tree
          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment -

          serg, I can accept this, but it sounds a bit strange:

          • we do not build 10.2 on somewhat more recent precise (EOL April 2017)
          • 10.2 GA is scheduled for late Jan 2016, which leaves about a month of valid 10.2 usage till CentOS 5 EOL
          • and that's only x86

          Anyway, there's nothing of a big value for 10.2 here.

          svoj Sergey Vojtovich added a comment - serg , I can accept this, but it sounds a bit strange: we do not build 10.2 on somewhat more recent precise (EOL April 2017) 10.2 GA is scheduled for late Jan 2016, which leaves about a month of valid 10.2 usage till CentOS 5 EOL and that's only x86 Anyway, there's nothing of a big value for 10.2 here.

          People

            svoj Sergey Vojtovich
            svoj Sergey Vojtovich
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Git Integration

                Error rendering 'com.xiplink.jira.git.jira_git_plugin:git-issue-webpanel'. Please contact your Jira administrators.