Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
10.1.17
Description
If a user sets something like the following in their configuration file:
innodb_page_size=64k
|
Then they will see a warning like the following in their error log:
InnoDB: Warning: innodb_page_size has been changed from default value 16384 to 65536d. (###EXPERIMENTAL### operation)
|
But the documentation seems to imply that this option is no longer experimental, since Percona's experimental version was replaced with the version from MySQL 5.6.
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/xtradbinnodb-server-system-variables/#innodb_page_size
Is this warning inaccurate? If so, the "experimental" reference should probably be removed.
Attachments
Activity
commit 84ce681969c3cdec095a45517164275989f95477
Author: Jan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
Date: Thu Oct 27 15:01:15 2016 +0300
MDEV-10917: Warning suggesting that innodb_page_size is experimental may be inaccurate
Removed experimental from message.
It looks like MariaDB 10.0 does not mention the word "experimental" in the message it prints to the error log:
2016-09-28 14:27:11 7f39475c4880 InnoDB: innodb-page-size has been changed from the default value 16384 to 8192.Was the "experimental" wording intentionally added in MariaDB 10.1, or did it somehow return from Percona's experimental version of innodb_page_size from MariaDB 5.5?