Details
-
Task
-
Status: Open (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
MXS-CAPACITY-Q4-2026
Description
When exploring the exasol database via portal 3311 exasolrouter or exasol connector, users operation schemas are cluttered with staging0- 3 tables. Ideally we can move these to a separate schema like maxscale_cdc_staging. Tablenames probably need a prefix including the original schema to avoid collision from the same table name in different schemas. I wonder if theres any downsides/issues having all these staging tables in 1 schema.