Details
-
Task
-
Status: Open (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
This issue is primarily concerning usability.
Both Innodb and Rocksdb have *_flush_at_trx_commit with same options.
This got me thinking, we should align more as it makes it easier to switch engines without as big a learning curve.
Example:
rocksdb_buffer_pool_size could replace rocksdb_block_cache_size
alternatively, both rocksdb_block_cache_size and innodb_buffer_pool_size could be replaced with something like rocksdb_cache_size and innodb_cache_size.. could go further with *_cache_instances _log_file_size etc