[MDEV-7205] Galera cluster & sql_log_bin = off don't work Created: 2014-11-25 Updated: 2019-07-18 Due: 2015-05-07 Resolved: 2015-08-08 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | MariaDB Server |
| Component/s: | Galera |
| Affects Version/s: | 10.0.13-galera, 10.0.14-galera |
| Fix Version/s: | 10.1.7 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Blocker |
| Reporter: | Aurélien LEQUOY | Assignee: | Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | galera | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Description |
|
my servers: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7544/15874745401_d3975432f6_b.jpg configuration on each node : (except server-id ofc)
on node 1 :
After on each node (1 at once)
successfull on the node where it's executed and the DELETE is not applied on other node of cluster .... The problem here the cluster is desynchronized. My goal, got a cluster and a server of history behind. (where delete not executed on slave) |
| Comments |
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2014-12-23 ] |
|
your goal can probably be achieved with set session wsrep_on=off |
| Comment by Aurélien LEQUOY [ 2015-03-24 ] |
|
the problem is that sql_log_bin = off work exactly like wsrep_on=off for me when we set sql_log_bin = off, and you do one insert / delete / update it's should be replecated each node of the cluster but not on their slave. |
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2015-04-28 ] |
|
http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2015-April/007790.html |
| Comment by Jan Lindström (Inactive) [ 2015-04-28 ] |
|
From Galera point of view patch looks correct, I just do not know all the possible side effects. |
| Comment by Aurélien LEQUOY [ 2015-05-05 ] |
|
my problem : I wanna make an operation, it's should replicated on each nodes of galera cluster but not on any slave behind. Actually sql_log_bin work exactly like an other command of WSREP, if we set it to off the is unsynced. I spoke with Seppo Jaakola and he told it was the standard comportement, but I think it's shoudln't, because we have so many other to do it with galera cluster, no one to do what explained previously. Aurélien |
| Comment by Sergei Golubchik [ 2015-05-08 ] |
|
Agree with jplindst. Looks ok, but I'm not sure I can see all side effects of this change. |
| Comment by Aurélien LEQUOY [ 2015-05-08 ] |
|
Normally it could only affect Galera, but I am agree will be not easy to do it. |
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2015-05-11 ] |
|
Right, I see some tests failing. This would require some more investigation. |
| Comment by Aurélien LEQUOY [ 2015-08-07 ] |
|
I really interesting by that ! any can give me some idea where to search ? |
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2015-08-08 ] |
|
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/commit/cd1a11ace3b4a4b034307590d58cc7a9d37004f6 |
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2015-08-08 ] |
|
Aurelien_LEQUOY While I have pushed the fix for this bug to 10.1, I skipped |
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2015-08-09 ] |
|
nirbhay_c can this implemented behaviour be documented at least on the binary logging system variables page |
| Comment by Aurélien LEQUOY [ 2015-08-10 ] |
|
thx, I will check if it's work fine in 10.1 |
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2015-08-12 ] |
|
danblack Added a note under 'sql_log_bin' : Thanks! |
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2015-08-12 ] |
|
Thanks nirbhay_c. |