[MDEV-6368] assertion xid_seqno > trx_sys_cur_xid_seqno Created: 2014-06-20 Updated: 2021-05-13 Resolved: 2016-06-01 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | MariaDB Server |
| Component/s: | Galera |
| Affects Version/s: | 5.5.37-galera, 10.1, 5.5-galera |
| Fix Version/s: | 10.2.1 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Daniel Black | Assignee: | Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | galera | ||
| Environment: |
ubuntu precise x86_64 |
||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | 10.1.14 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
compiled in debug mode (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug in debian/rules as argument to cmake)
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2014-06-20 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is it reproducible in normal conditions? My builds are all 'Debug' and I have so far not | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2014-06-20 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I guess the attached valgrind output is linked to MDEV#6300? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2014-06-21 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It was reproducible in the scene that the same syslog output occurred on every restart. I reverted to a standard build and am running valgrind to find data for #6300 on this server currently. I can start to looking at this bug after the memleak. If I get a gdb breakpoint at the assert line number if there any particular data structures to print out? Any other early configuration items I can try? Though the valgrind output was attempting to find the resolution to #6300 the server didn't really start or get the application interaction to get required to examine the #6300 for that memory leak. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2014-07-24 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
sorry, have been unable to reproduce this. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Elena Stepanova [ 2016-04-19 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One easy way to reproduce the assertion failure is to run sys_vars.wsrep_start_position_basic with --innodb:
However, the stack trace looks totally different:
nirbhay_c, if you think it's a different problem, please feel free to convert it into a separate bug report, or tell me to do so. Reproducible on current 10.1 too. I didn't try 10.0, but I assume it wouldn't go anywhere there. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2016-05-02 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
jplindst The patch is a bit large and touches some key parts so http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2016-May/009338.html | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Nirbhay Choubey (Inactive) [ 2016-05-03 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2016-May/009343.html | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comment by Jan Lindström (Inactive) [ 2016-05-03 ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Latest version ok from me. |