[MDEV-3953] Add columns for ROWS_EXAMINED & ROWS_SENT to I_S and processlist Created: 2012-12-19 Updated: 2023-12-15 Resolved: 2023-11-07 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | MariaDB Server |
| Component/s: | Information Schema |
| Fix Version/s: | 11.3.1 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Critical |
| Reporter: | MG | Assignee: | Michael Widenius |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | Preview_11.3 | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
The 'progress' column for DDL (ALTER and similar commands) does not provide diagnostic information for DML (eg SELECT, UPDATE) In Percona Server, there are these nice additional columns: http://www.percona.com/doc/percona-server/5.5/diagnostics/process_list.html |
| Comments |
| Comment by Sergei Golubchik [ 2013-02-06 ] |
|
ROWS_EXAMINED is added |
| Comment by Colin Charles [ 2017-09-12 ] |
|
This didn't make it into 10.2? Id: 13 |
| Comment by Michael Widenius [ 2023-09-11 ] |
|
I am working on adding SENT_ROWS to information_schema.processlist in 10.3 |
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2023-09-20 ] |
|
monty, serg, while doing this I think changing the type to BIGINT per Pull request on that issue. |
| Comment by Michael Widenius [ 2023-10-01 ] |
|
The patch only adds fields to 'information_schema.processlist' as it easy for a user to decide which fields to select. I did not change 'show processlist' as I did not want to change the default output (and with SHOW processlist there is no options in selecting just those fields one wants). |
| Comment by Elena Stepanova [ 2023-10-16 ] |
|
As of preview-11.3-preview b09e99ff, the status is as follows: Must fix:
Good to have:
Uncertainties:
After the changes are made, another quick round of testing will be performed. |
| Comment by Michael Widenius [ 2023-10-22 ] |
|
|
| Comment by Elena Stepanova [ 2023-10-26 ] |
|
As of preview-11.3-preview de145915, the status is as follows: Must fix:
Uncertainties:
If no changes are made other than the test fix, then the feature can be merged into main without another round of testing. If any of the issues listed in the second part are addressed, then I will need to look at it again. |
| Comment by Elena Stepanova [ 2023-11-01 ] |
|
As of bb-11.3-monty 71c9f29a: Must fix:
After the test is fixed, I have no objections against pushing the code into 11.3 and releasing with 11.3.1. I don't know however whether the review of the latest version has been done as it was intended (or maybe it was decided that it's not needed after all). For the record:
|