[MDEV-12278] Adding a 10.1.22 slave to 10.1.21 master freezing all dump threads Created: 2017-03-16 Updated: 2017-03-17 Resolved: 2017-03-17 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | MariaDB Server |
| Component/s: | Replication |
| Affects Version/s: | 10.1.22 |
| Fix Version/s: | N/A |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Critical |
| Reporter: | VAROQUI Stephane | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Not a Bug | Votes: | 2 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Description |
|
The setup is master-slaves Relevant settings on replication is
I noted that the master have 1 month binlog 22G this could be investigated We have tried few things on this new slave to understand what could be wrong here Disable GTID vi master_use_gtid=no and give the old styme coordonate Disable all semisync plugin Disable l parameters
Issue still visible More info may be provided via their support contract i will link to this jira when i get some feedback Any suggestion on how to move forward is welcome |
| Comments |
| Comment by Pierre ANTOINE [ 2017-03-16 ] | |
|
If you need more intels like full confs or output from particulars commands, just ask me. Pierre | |
| Comment by Daniel Black [ 2017-03-16 ] | |
|
From the slave at the time of lockup would be useful.
| |
| Comment by Elena Stepanova [ 2017-03-16 ] | |
|
Yes, could you please provide full configs? The one in the description cannot be right, it has a typo in it – innodb_defragement, InnoDB wouldn't even start (and if InnoDB is a default engine in your configuration, the server wouldn't start either). Also, the description says "other 10.1.21 slaves IO threads stopped replicating from the Master" – what does it mean, exactly? What is the slave status on the stalled slaves, especially for the IO thread, and what does SHOW PROCESSLIST on master say for Binlog Dump threads? | |
| Comment by VAROQUI Stephane [ 2017-03-16 ] | |
| Comment by Pierre ANTOINE [ 2017-03-16 ] | |
|
Probleme solved: Two nodes have same server-id | |
| Comment by VAROQUI Stephane [ 2017-03-16 ] | |
|
We found out that the new server was provisioned with the same server id as the existing slave we have been monitoring the replication . So it looks like only one of those slaves having same server idea beeing notify for events . This issue can be close | |
| Comment by Elena Stepanova [ 2017-03-17 ] | |
|
stephane@skysql.com, if you want to request the feature you mentioned above, please file a separate JIRA item (task), I don't think it makes sense to convert this one, it has too much information irrelevant to the request. |